2000 • Toyota
Celica
Toyota Celica 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport (192 Hp) 2000Overall Score62.5/100
2000 Toyota Celica vs 1999 Acura Integra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Acura
Integra
Acura Integra 1.8 (196 Hp) 1999Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Toyota Celica
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
62.5–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota CelicaSpecificationAcura Integra
ToyotaMakeAcura
CelicaModelIntegra
2000Model year1999
CoupeBody typeCoupe
4Seats4
2Doors2
Performance
Toyota CelicaSpecificationAcura Integra
7,4 s0–100 km/h6,7 s
225 km/hTop speed234 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1797 cc
192 HPPower196 HP
180 NmTorque178 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota CelicaSpecificationAcura Integra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota CelicaSpecificationAcura Integra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/50 R16 VTyre size195/55 R15; 195/60 R16; 215/45 R16
YesABS—
Dimensions
Toyota CelicaSpecificationAcura Integra
4335 mmLength4380 mm
1735 mmWidth1710 mm
1315 mmHeight1338 mm
1215 KgWeight1120 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2570 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Toyota Celica and 1999 Acura Integra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Celica leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…