1999 • Acura
Integra
Acura Integra 1.8 (196 Hp) 1999Overall Score61.5/100
1999 Acura Integra vs 2000 Toyota Celica Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Toyota
Celica
Toyota Celica 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport (192 Hp) 2000Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Toyota Celica
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
61.5–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Acura IntegraSpecificationToyota Celica
AcuraMakeToyota
IntegraModelCelica
1999Model year2000
CoupeBody typeCoupe
4Seats4
2Doors2
Performance
Acura IntegraSpecificationToyota Celica
6,7 s0–100 km/h7,4 s
234 km/hTop speed225 km/h
1797 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
196 HPPower192 HP
178 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Acura IntegraSpecificationToyota Celica
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
—Average consumption8,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Acura IntegraSpecificationToyota Celica
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/55 R15; 195/60 R16; 215/45 R16Tyre size205/50 R16 V
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Acura IntegraSpecificationToyota Celica
4380 mmLength4335 mm
1710 mmWidth1735 mm
1338 mmHeight1315 mm
1120 KgWeight1215 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Acura Integra and 2000 Toyota Celica approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Celica leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…