DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Honda Civic vs 2000 Toyota Celica Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Celica

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

61.5–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeToyota
CivicModelCelica
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

8,3 s0–100 km/h7,4 s
223 km/hTop speed225 km/h
1797 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
169 HPPower192 HP
166 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,3 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
—Average consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/55 R15Tyre size205/50 R16 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4325 mmLength4335 mm
1695 mmWidth1735 mm
1390 mmHeight1315 mm
1220 KgWeight1215 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Honda Civic and 2000 Toyota Celica approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Celica leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…