1999 • Toyota
Celica
Toyota Celica 1.8 i GT- R (182 Hp) 1999Overall Score61.5/100
1999 Toyota Celica vs 2000 Toyota Celica Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Toyota
Celica
Toyota Celica 1.8 i GT- R (182 Hp) 2000Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Toyota Celica
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
61.5–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota CelicaSpecificationToyota Celica
ToyotaMakeToyota
CelicaModelCelica
1999Model year2000
CoupeBody typeCoupe
4Seats4
2Doors2
Performance
Toyota CelicaSpecificationToyota Celica
7,5 s0–100 km/h7,5 s
210 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
182 HPPower182 HP
181 NmTorque181 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota CelicaSpecificationToyota Celica
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota CelicaSpecificationToyota Celica
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/50 R16Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota CelicaSpecificationToyota Celica
4328 mmLength4328 mm
1735 mmWidth1735 mm
1305 mmHeight1305 mm
1190 KgWeight1190 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Toyota Celica and 2000 Toyota Celica approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Celica leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…