2000 • Honda
Integra
Honda Integra 1.8 i (180 Hp) 2000Overall Score62.5/100
2000 Honda Integra vs 1999 Toyota Celica Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Toyota
Celica
Toyota Celica 1.8 i GT- R (182 Hp) 1999Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Honda Integra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
62.5–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Honda IntegraSpecificationToyota Celica
HondaMakeToyota
IntegraModelCelica
2000Model year1999
CoupeBody typeCoupe
4Seats4
2Doors2
Performance
Honda IntegraSpecificationToyota Celica
7,0 s0–100 km/h7,5 s
210 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1797 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
180 HPPower182 HP
175 NmTorque181 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Honda IntegraSpecificationToyota Celica
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption8,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,6 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Honda IntegraSpecificationToyota Celica
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/55 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Honda IntegraSpecificationToyota Celica
4380 mmLength4328 mm
1695 mmWidth1735 mm
1335 mmHeight1305 mm
1200 KgWeight1190 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Honda Integra and 1999 Toyota Celica approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Honda Integra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…