2000 • Acura
Integra
Acura Integra 1.8 (170 Hp) 2000Overall Score62.5/100
2000 Acura Integra vs 1999 Toyota Celica Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Toyota
Celica
Toyota Celica 1.8 i GT- R (182 Hp) 1999Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Acura Integra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
62.5–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Acura IntegraSpecificationToyota Celica
AcuraMakeToyota
IntegraModelCelica
2000Model year1999
CoupeBody typeCoupe
4Seats4
2Doors2
Performance
Acura IntegraSpecificationToyota Celica
—0–100 km/h7,5 s
0 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1797 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
170 HPPower182 HP
174 NmTorque181 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Acura IntegraSpecificationToyota Celica
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Acura IntegraSpecificationToyota Celica
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/55 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Acura IntegraSpecificationToyota Celica
4380 mmLength4328 mm
1710 mmWidth1735 mm
1338 mmHeight1305 mm
1235 KgWeight1190 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Acura Integra and 1999 Toyota Celica approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Acura Integra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…