1999 • Toyota
Celica
Toyota Celica 1.8 i GT- R (182 Hp) 1999Overall Score61.5/100
1999 Toyota Celica vs 2000 Honda Integra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Honda
Integra
Honda Integra 1.8 i (180 Hp) 2000Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Honda Integra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
61.5–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota CelicaSpecificationHonda Integra
ToyotaMakeHonda
CelicaModelIntegra
1999Model year2000
CoupeBody typeCoupe
4Seats4
2Doors2
Performance
Toyota CelicaSpecificationHonda Integra
7,5 s0–100 km/h7,0 s
210 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1797 cc
182 HPPower180 HP
181 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota CelicaSpecificationHonda Integra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption—
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption6,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota CelicaSpecificationHonda Integra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota CelicaSpecificationHonda Integra
4328 mmLength4380 mm
1735 mmWidth1695 mm
1305 mmHeight1335 mm
1190 KgWeight1200 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2570 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Toyota Celica and 2000 Honda Integra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Honda Integra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…