1999 • Toyota
Celica
Toyota Celica 1.8 i GT- R (182 Hp) 1999Overall Score61.5/100
1999 Toyota Celica vs 2000 Acura Integra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Acura
Integra
Acura Integra 1.8 (196 Hp) 2000Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Acura Integra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
61.5–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota CelicaSpecificationAcura Integra
ToyotaMakeAcura
CelicaModelIntegra
1999Model year2000
CoupeBody typeCoupe
4Seats4
2Doors2
Performance
Toyota CelicaSpecificationAcura Integra
7,5 s0–100 km/h6,7 s
210 km/hTop speed234 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1797 cc
182 HPPower196 HP
181 NmTorque178 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota CelicaSpecificationAcura Integra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota CelicaSpecificationAcura Integra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size195/55 R15; 195/60 R16; 215/45 R16
YesABS—
Dimensions
Toyota CelicaSpecificationAcura Integra
4328 mmLength4380 mm
1735 mmWidth1710 mm
1305 mmHeight1338 mm
1190 KgWeight1120 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2570 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Toyota Celica and 2000 Acura Integra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Acura Integra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…