1998 • Toyota
Celica
Toyota Celica 1.8 i 16V (AT200/ST) 1998Overall Score58.5/100
1998 Toyota Celica vs 1998 Honda Integra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Honda
Integra
Honda Integra 1.6 ZXi (120 Hp) 1998Overall Score59.25/100
WINNER
Honda Integra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
58.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota CelicaSpecificationHonda Integra
ToyotaMakeHonda
CelicaModelIntegra
1998Model year1998
CoupeBody typeCoupe
4Seats4
2Doors2
Performance
Toyota CelicaSpecificationHonda Integra
9,5 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1762 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
116 HPPower120 HP
154 NmTorque142 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota CelicaSpecificationHonda Integra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota CelicaSpecificationHonda Integra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 HTyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota CelicaSpecificationHonda Integra
4425 mmLength4380 mm
1750 mmWidth1695 mm
1305 mmHeight1335 mm
1170 KgWeight1050 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2570 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Toyota Celica and 1998 Honda Integra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Honda Integra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…