DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Honda Integra vs 1998 Toyota Celica Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Integra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeToyota
IntegraModelCelica
1998Model year1998
CoupeBody typeCoupe
4Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
175 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1762 cc
120 HPPower116 HP
142 NmTorque154 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size195/65 R14 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4380 mmLength4425 mm
1695 mmWidth1750 mm
1335 mmHeight1305 mm
1050 KgWeight1170 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Honda Integra and 1998 Toyota Celica approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Integra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…