1998 • Audi
Cabriolet
Audi Cabriolet 1.8 20V (125 Hp) 1998Overall Score58.25/100
1998 Audi Cabriolet vs 1998 Toyota Celica Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Toyota
Celica
Toyota Celica 1.8 i 16V (AT200/ST) 1998Overall Score58.5/100
WINNER
Toyota Celica
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi CabrioletSpecificationToyota Celica
AudiMakeToyota
CabrioletModelCelica
1998Model year1998
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
4Seats4
2Doors2
Performance
Audi CabrioletSpecificationToyota Celica
11,5 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
195 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1762 cc
125 HPPower116 HP
173 NmTorque154 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi CabrioletSpecificationToyota Celica
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption—
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi CabrioletSpecificationToyota Celica
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R14 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi CabrioletSpecificationToyota Celica
4366 mmLength4425 mm
1716 mmWidth1750 mm
1379 mmHeight1305 mm
1370 KgWeight1170 Kg
2556 mmWheelbase2450 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Audi Cabriolet and 1998 Toyota Celica approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Celica leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…