DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 AC ACE vs 1999 BMW M3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW M3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

82.5–83.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AC ACESpecificationBMW M3
ACMakeBMW
ACEModelM3
2000Model year1999
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
2Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

AC ACESpecificationBMW M3
5,5 s0–100 km/h5,6 s
250 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3506 ccEngine displacement3201 cc
354 HPPower321 HP
407 NmTorque350 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

AC ACESpecificationBMW M3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
90 ltFuel tank62 lt
20 ltUrban consumption17,0 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,7 lt
—Average consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

AC ACESpecificationBMW M3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
245/40 ZR18; 255/45 ZR18Tyre size225/45 R17; 245/40 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

AC ACESpecificationBMW M3
4420 mmLength4433 mm
1870 mmWidth1710 mm
1300 mmHeight1340 mm
1510 KgWeight1560 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 AC ACE and 1999 BMW M3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW M3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…