DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Toyota 4runner vs 2003 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeFord
4runnerModelExplorer
2003Model year2003
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
4664 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
235 HPPower242 HP
434 NmTorque380 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
87 ltFuel tank85 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
12,4 ltExtra-urban consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
265/70 R16; 265/65 R17Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4800 mmLength4810 mm
1875 mmWidth1830 mm
1750 mmHeight1830 mm
2000 KgWeight1965 Kg
2790 mmWheelbase2890 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Toyota 4runner and 2003 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…