DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Econoline vs 2003 Toyota 4runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Econoline

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeToyota
EconolineModel4runner
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeSUV
8Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4664 cc
218 HPPower235 HP
393 NmTorque434 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
132 ltFuel tank87 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
12,4 ltExtra-urban consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size265/70 R16; 265/65 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

5382 mmLength4800 mm
2014 mmWidth1875 mm
2050 mmHeight1750 mm
—Weight2000 Kg
3505 mmWheelbase2790 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Econoline and 2003 Toyota 4runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Econoline leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…