DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Crown Victoria vs 2003 Toyota 4runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Crown Victoria

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeToyota
Crown VictoriaModel4runner
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSUV
6Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

177 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4664 cc
227 HPPower235 HP
369 NmTorque434 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank87 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
225/60 R16Tyre size265/70 R16; 265/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5385 mmLength4800 mm
1986 mmWidth1875 mm
1443 mmHeight1750 mm
1875 KgWeight2000 Kg
2913 mmWheelbase2790 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Crown Victoria and 2003 Toyota 4runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Crown Victoria leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…