DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Toyota 4runner vs 2003 Ford Econoline Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Econoline

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeFord
4runnerModelEconoline
2003Model year2003
SUVBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
5Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
4664 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
235 HPPower218 HP
434 NmTorque393 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
87 ltFuel tank132 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
12,4 ltExtra-urban consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
265/70 R16; 265/65 R17Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4800 mmLength5382 mm
1875 mmWidth2014 mm
1750 mmHeight2050 mm
2000 KgWeight—
2790 mmWheelbase3505 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Toyota 4runner and 2003 Ford Econoline approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Econoline leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…