DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Toyota 4runner vs 2000 Renault 19 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota 4runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 31.5 points.

78.75–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeRenault
4runnerModel19
2013Model year2000
SUVBody typeHatchback
5/7Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

—0–100 km/h14,8 s
0 km/hTop speed187 km/h
3956 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
270 HPPower90 HP
377 NmTorque131 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
90 ltFuel tank55 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption8,5 lt
10,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
12,3 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
265/70 R17; 245/60 R20Tyre size165/70 R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

4823 mmLength4162 mm
1925 mmWidth1696 mm
1780-1816 mmHeight1412 mm
2120 KgWeight965 Kg
2789 mmWheelbase2544 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Toyota 4runner and 2000 Renault 19 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota 4runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 31.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…