DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Mazda CX-9 vs 2013 Toyota 4runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota 4runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeToyota
CX-9Model4runner
2015Model year2013
SUVBody typeSUV
7Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3726 ccEngine displacement3956 cc
273 HPPower270 HP
270 NmTorque377 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank90 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption10,6 lt
—Average consumption12,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
245/60 R18Tyre size265/70 R17; 245/60 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5232 mmLength4823 mm
1935 mmWidth1925 mm
1727 mmHeight1780-1816 mm
1958 KgWeight2120 Kg
2875 mmWheelbase2789 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Mazda CX-9 and 2013 Toyota 4runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota 4runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…