DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Toyota Highlander vs 2013 Toyota 4runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota 4runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeToyota
HighlanderModel4runner
2015Model year2013
SUVBody typeSUV
7Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

7,3 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3456 ccEngine displacement3956 cc
280 HPPower270 HP
337 NmTorque377 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank90 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption10,6 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption12,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—Drivetrain4x4
—Gears5
—Tyre size265/70 R17; 245/60 R20
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4865 mmLength4823 mm
1925 mmWidth1925 mm
1730 mmHeight1780-1816 mm
2205 KgWeight2120 Kg
2790 mmWheelbase2789 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Toyota Highlander and 2013 Toyota 4runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota 4runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…