DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota 4runner vs 2000 Nissan Pathfinder Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Pathfinder

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeNissan
4runnerModelPathfinder
2000Model year2000
SUVBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed155 km/h
2694 ccEngine displacement2664 cc
150 HPPower131 HP
240 NmTorque279 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
225/75 R15; 265/70 R16Tyre size235/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4656 mmLength4530 mm
1690 mmWidth1840 mm
1715-1740 mmHeight1750 mm
1515 KgWeight1870 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota 4runner and 2000 Nissan Pathfinder approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Pathfinder leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…