2000 • Nissan
Navara
Nissan Navara 3.0 Td Double Cab 4WD (148 Hp) 2000Overall Score64.75/100
2000 Nissan Navara vs 2000 Toyota 4runner Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Toyota
4runner
Toyota 4runner 2.7 16V (150 Hp) 2000Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Toyota 4runner
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan NavaraSpecificationToyota 4runner
NissanMakeToyota
NavaraModel4runner
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Nissan NavaraSpecificationToyota 4runner
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2953 ccEngine displacement2694 cc
148 HPPower150 HP
314 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan NavaraSpecificationToyota 4runner
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size225/75 R15; 265/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan NavaraSpecificationToyota 4runner
5220 mmLength4656 mm
1850 mmWidth1690 mm
1774 mmHeight1715-1740 mm
—Weight1515 Kg
3200 mmWheelbase2675 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Nissan Navara and 2000 Toyota 4runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota 4runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…