2000 • Mercury
Sable
Mercury Sable 3.0 V6 (147 Hp) 2000Overall Score66.25/100
2000 Mercury Sable vs 2000 Toyota 4runner Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Toyota
4runner
Toyota 4runner 2.7 16V (150 Hp) 2000Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Mercury Sable
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mercury SableSpecificationToyota 4runner
MercuryMakeToyota
SableModel4runner
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Mercury SableSpecificationToyota 4runner
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2986 ccEngine displacement2694 cc
147 HPPower150 HP
230 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mercury SableSpecificationToyota 4runner
PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption—
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mercury SableSpecificationToyota 4runner
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size225/75 R15; 265/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mercury SableSpecificationToyota 4runner
5070 mmLength4656 mm
1850 mmWidth1690 mm
1410 mmHeight1715-1740 mm
1535 KgWeight1515 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2675 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mercury Sable and 2000 Toyota 4runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mercury Sable leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…