DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota 4runner vs 2000 Nissan Navara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota 4runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeNissan
4runnerModelNavara
2000Model year2000
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2694 ccEngine displacement2953 cc
150 HPPower148 HP
240 NmTorque314 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank80 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
225/75 R15; 265/70 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4656 mmLength5220 mm
1690 mmWidth1850 mm
1715-1740 mmHeight1774 mm
1515 KgWeight—
2675 mmWheelbase3200 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota 4runner and 2000 Nissan Navara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota 4runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…