DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota 4runner vs 2000 Mercury Sable Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Sable

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeMercury
4runnerModelSable
2000Model year2000
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2694 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
150 HPPower147 HP
240 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Urban consumption12,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/75 R15; 265/70 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4656 mmLength5070 mm
1690 mmWidth1850 mm
1715-1740 mmHeight1410 mm
1515 KgWeight1535 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota 4runner and 2000 Mercury Sable approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Sable leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…