DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Tofas Tempra vs 2000 FAW Jetta Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW Jetta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TofasMakeFAW
TempraModelJetta
1999Model year2000
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
177 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1581 ccEngine displacement1595 cc
86 HPPower87 HP
130 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14TTyre size185/60 R14 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4472 mmLength4385 mm
1695 mmWidth1674 mm
1500 mmHeight1415 mm
1035 KgWeight1060 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2471 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Tofas Tempra and 2000 FAW Jetta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW Jetta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…