2000 • Fiat
Siena
Fiat Siena 1.6 i (87 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
2000 Fiat Siena vs 1999 Tofas Tempra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Tofas
Tempra
Tofas Tempra 1.6 SX (86 Hp) 1999Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Fiat Siena
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat SienaSpecificationTofas Tempra
FiatMakeTofas
SienaModelTempra
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Fiat SienaSpecificationTofas Tempra
11,5 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
175 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1581 ccEngine displacement1581 cc
87 HPPower86 HP
125 NmTorque130 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat SienaSpecificationTofas Tempra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Average consumption7,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat SienaSpecificationTofas Tempra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size175/65 R14T
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Fiat SienaSpecificationTofas Tempra
4100 mmLength4472 mm
1626 mmWidth1695 mm
1445 mmHeight1500 mm
1035 KgWeight1035 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2540 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Fiat Siena and 1999 Tofas Tempra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Siena leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…