2000 • Citroen
Xsara
Citroen Xsara 1.6 (88 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
2000 Citroen Xsara vs 1999 Tofas Tempra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Tofas
Tempra
Tofas Tempra 1.6 SX (86 Hp) 1999Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Citroen Xsara
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Citroen XsaraSpecificationTofas Tempra
CitroenMakeTofas
XsaraModelTempra
2000Model year1999
MinivanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Citroen XsaraSpecificationTofas Tempra
15,0 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
168 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1587 ccEngine displacement1581 cc
88 HPPower86 HP
135 NmTorque130 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Citroen XsaraSpecificationTofas Tempra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank65 lt
12 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption7,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Citroen XsaraSpecificationTofas Tempra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14T
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Citroen XsaraSpecificationTofas Tempra
4257 mmLength4472 mm
1751 mmWidth1695 mm
1637 mmHeight1500 mm
1240 KgWeight1035 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2540 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Citroen Xsara and 1999 Tofas Tempra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen Xsara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…