DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Tofas Tempra vs 2000 Citroen Xsara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen Xsara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TofasMakeCitroen
TempraModelXsara
1999Model year2000
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
177 km/hTop speed168 km/h
1581 ccEngine displacement1587 cc
86 HPPower88 HP
130 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption12 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14TTyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4472 mmLength4257 mm
1695 mmWidth1751 mm
1500 mmHeight1637 mm
1035 KgWeight1240 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Tofas Tempra and 2000 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen Xsara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…