2000 • Tata
Sumo
Tata Sumo 1.9 TD (90 Hp) 2000Overall Score55.5/100
2000 Tata Sumo vs 2000 Hyundai Lantra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Hyundai
Lantra
Hyundai Lantra 1.9 D (68 hp) 2000Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Hyundai Lantra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Tata SumoSpecificationHyundai Lantra
TataMakeHyundai
SumoModelLantra
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats4+1
4Doors5
Performance
Tata SumoSpecificationHyundai Lantra
118 km/hTop speed158 km/h
1948 ccEngine displacement1905 cc
90 HPPower68 HP
186 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Tata SumoSpecificationHyundai Lantra
DieselFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption7,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,9 lt
—Average consumption6,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Tata SumoSpecificationHyundai Lantra
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABS—
Dimensions
Tata SumoSpecificationHyundai Lantra
4450 mmLength—
1755 mmWidth—
1975 mmHeight—
1720 KgWeight—
2400 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Tata Sumo and 2000 Hyundai Lantra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Hyundai Lantra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…