2000 • Hyundai
Lantra
Hyundai Lantra 1.9 D (68 hp) 2000Overall Score56.25/100
2000 Hyundai Lantra vs 2000 Tata Sumo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Tata
Sumo
Tata Sumo 1.9 TD (90 Hp) 2000Overall Score55.5/100
WINNER
Hyundai Lantra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Hyundai LantraSpecificationTata Sumo
HyundaiMakeTata
LantraModelSumo
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
4+1Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Hyundai LantraSpecificationTata Sumo
158 km/hTop speed118 km/h
1905 ccEngine displacement1948 cc
68 HPPower90 HP
0 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Hyundai LantraSpecificationTata Sumo
DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank65 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption—
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,3 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Hyundai LantraSpecificationTata Sumo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size215/75 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Hyundai LantraSpecificationTata Sumo
—Length4450 mm
—Width1755 mm
—Height1975 mm
—Weight1720 Kg
—Wheelbase2400 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Hyundai Lantra and 2000 Tata Sumo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Hyundai Lantra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…