DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Suzuki Vitara vs 2000 Tata Sumo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Vitara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeTata
VitaraModelSumo
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

150 km/hTop speed118 km/h
1905 ccEngine displacement1948 cc
75 HPPower90 HP
135 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank65 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption—
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/80 R15Tyre size215/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4030 mmLength4450 mm
1630 mmWidth1755 mm
1695 mmHeight1975 mm
1405 KgWeight1720 Kg
2480 mmWheelbase2400 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Suzuki Vitara and 2000 Tata Sumo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…