2012 • Tata
Nano
Tata Nano 0.6 (38 Hp) 2012Overall Score46.5/100
2012 Tata Nano vs 2012 Skoda Citigo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Skoda
Citigo
Skoda Citigo 1.0 (60 Hp) 2012Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Tata Nano
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Tata NanoSpecificationSkoda Citigo
TataMakeSkoda
NanoModelCitigo
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats4
5Doors3
Performance
Tata NanoSpecificationSkoda Citigo
12,6 s0–100 km/h15,3 s
105 km/hTop speed160 km/h
624 ccEngine displacement999 cc
38 HPPower60 HP
51 NmTorque95 Nm
2Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Tata NanoSpecificationSkoda Citigo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
24 ltFuel tank35 lt
—Urban consumption5,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,9 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Tata NanoSpecificationSkoda Citigo
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
135/70 R12; 155/65 R12Tyre size165/70 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Tata NanoSpecificationSkoda Citigo
3164 mmLength3563 mm
1750 mmWidth1641 mm
1652 mmHeight1478 mm
695 KgWeight932 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2420 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Tata Nano and 2012 Skoda Citigo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Tata Nano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…