DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volkswagen Up! vs 2012 Tata Nano Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tata Nano

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.25–46.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeTata
Up!ModelNano
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
3Doors5

Performance

16,3 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
164 km/hTop speed105 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement624 cc
68 HPPower38 HP
90 NmTorque51 Nm
3Cylinders2

Fuel & Consumption

Petrol / CNGFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank24 lt
—Average consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
—Tyre size135/70 R12; 155/65 R12
YesABS—

Dimensions

3540 mmLength3164 mm
1645 mmWidth1750 mm
1489 mmHeight1652 mm
1031 KgWeight695 Kg
2420 mmWheelbase2230 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volkswagen Up! and 2012 Tata Nano approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tata Nano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…