DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Chevrolet Celta vs 2012 Tata Nano Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tata Nano

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.25–46.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeTata
CeltaModelNano
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
3Doors5

Performance

15,5 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
151 km/hTop speed105 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement624 cc
60 HPPower38 HP
81 NmTorque51 Nm
4Cylinders2

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank24 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
145/80 R13TTyre size135/70 R12; 155/65 R12
YesABS—

Dimensions

3748 mmLength3164 mm
1608 mmWidth1750 mm
1429 mmHeight1652 mm
834 KgWeight695 Kg
2443 mmWheelbase2230 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Chevrolet Celta and 2012 Tata Nano approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tata Nano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…