DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Tata Nano vs 2012 Opel Corsa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tata Nano

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Tata NanoSpecificationOpel Corsa
TataMakeOpel
NanoModelCorsa
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Tata NanoSpecificationOpel Corsa
12,6 s0–100 km/h18,2 s
105 km/hTop speed150 km/h
624 ccEngine displacement998 cc
38 HPPower64 HP
51 NmTorque89 Nm
2Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

Tata NanoSpecificationOpel Corsa
PetrolFuel typePetrol
24 ltFuel tank42 lt
—Urban consumption7,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,6 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Tata NanoSpecificationOpel Corsa
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
135/70 R12; 155/65 R12Tyre size185/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Tata NanoSpecificationOpel Corsa
3164 mmLength3999 mm
1750 mmWidth1737 mm
1652 mmHeight1488 mm
695 KgWeight1045 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2511 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Tata Nano and 2012 Opel Corsa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tata Nano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…