2012 • Tata
Nano
Tata Nano 0.6 (38 Hp) 2012Overall Score46.5/100
2012 Tata Nano vs 2012 Chevrolet Spark Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Chevrolet
Spark
Chevrolet Spark 1.0 16V (68 Hp) 2012Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Tata Nano
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Tata NanoSpecificationChevrolet Spark
TataMakeChevrolet
NanoModelSpark
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Tata NanoSpecificationChevrolet Spark
12,6 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
105 km/hTop speed154 km/h
624 ccEngine displacement995 cc
38 HPPower68 HP
51 NmTorque93 Nm
2Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Tata NanoSpecificationChevrolet Spark
PetrolFuel typePetrol
24 ltFuel tank35 lt
—Urban consumption6,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Tata NanoSpecificationChevrolet Spark
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
135/70 R12; 155/65 R12Tyre size155/80/13
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Tata NanoSpecificationChevrolet Spark
3164 mmLength3640 mm
1750 mmWidth1597 mm
1652 mmHeight1522 mm
695 KgWeight939 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2375 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Tata Nano and 2012 Chevrolet Spark approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Tata Nano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…