2012 • Tata
Nano
Tata Nano 0.6 (38 Hp) 2012Overall Score46.5/100
2012 Tata Nano vs 2012 Chevrolet Celta Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Chevrolet
Celta
Chevrolet Celta 1.0 i 16V (60 Hp) 2012Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Tata Nano
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Tata NanoSpecificationChevrolet Celta
TataMakeChevrolet
NanoModelCelta
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeSedan
4Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Tata NanoSpecificationChevrolet Celta
12,6 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
105 km/hTop speed151 km/h
624 ccEngine displacement999 cc
38 HPPower60 HP
51 NmTorque81 Nm
2Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Tata NanoSpecificationChevrolet Celta
PetrolFuel typePetrol
24 ltFuel tank46 lt
—Urban consumption7,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Tata NanoSpecificationChevrolet Celta
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
135/70 R12; 155/65 R12Tyre size145/80 R13T
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Tata NanoSpecificationChevrolet Celta
3164 mmLength3748 mm
1750 mmWidth1608 mm
1652 mmHeight1429 mm
695 KgWeight834 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2443 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Tata Nano and 2012 Chevrolet Celta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Tata Nano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…