2017 • Tata
Nano
Tata Nano GenX 0.6i (38 Hp) 2017Overall Score57.5/100
2017 Tata Nano vs 2017 Volkswagen Polo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo Trendline 2017 1.0 75 HPOverall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Tata Nano
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
57.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Tata NanoSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
TataMakeVolkswagen
NanoModelPolo
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Tata NanoSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
—0–100 km/h14,3 s
105 km/hTop speed173 km/h
624 ccEngine displacement999 cc
38 HPPower75 HP
51 NmTorque95 Nm
2Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Tata NanoSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
24 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption6,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,4 lt
—Average consumption5,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Tata NanoSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—TransmissionManual
135/70 R12; 155/65 R12Tyre size14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Tata NanoSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
3164 mmLength3972 mm
1750 mmWidth1682 mm
1652 mmHeight1453 mm
695-735 KgWeight1050 kg
—Luggage capacity280 lt
2230 mmWheelbase—
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Tata Nano and 2017 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Tata Nano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…