DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Volkswagen Polo vs 2017 Tata Nano Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tata Nano

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.25–57.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeTata
PoloModelNano
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors5

Performance

14,3 s0–100 km/h—
173 km/hTop speed105 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement624 cc
75 HPPower38 HP
95 NmTorque51 Nm
3Cylinders2

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank24 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
ManualTransmission—
14Tyre size135/70 R12; 155/65 R12
YesABS—

Dimensions

3972 mmLength3164 mm
1682 mmWidth1750 mm
1453 mmHeight1652 mm
1050 kgWeight695-735 Kg
280 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2230 mm

Additional Features

Volkswagen PoloDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistTrip ComputerPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsUSB PortBluetooth
Tata Nano

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Volkswagen Polo and 2017 Tata Nano approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tata Nano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…