DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Renault Symbol vs 2017 Tata Nano Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tata Nano

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.25–57.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeTata
SymbolModelNano
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors5

Performance

14,2 s0–100 km/h—
158 km/hTop speed105 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement624 cc
73 HPPower38 HP
97 NmTorque51 Nm
3Cylinders2

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank24 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption—
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
ManualTransmission—
15Tyre size135/70 R12; 155/65 R12
YesABS—

Dimensions

4348 mmLength3164 mm
1733 mmWidth1750 mm
1517 mmHeight1652 mm
1048 kgWeight695-735 Kg
510 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2230 mm

Additional Features

Renault SymbolDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagABSEBDESPASRArmrestPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsUSB PortBluetooth
Tata Nano

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Renault Symbol and 2017 Tata Nano approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tata Nano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…