DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Suzuki Vitara vs 2016 Chevrolet Trax Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Trax

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeChevrolet
VitaraModelTrax
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
200 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1373 ccEngine displacement1364 cc
140 HPPower140 HP
220 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank53 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/55 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4175 mmLength4248 mm
1775 mmWidth1776 mm
1610 mmHeight1674 mm
1210 KgWeight1380 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2555 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Suzuki Vitara and 2016 Chevrolet Trax approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Trax leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…