DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo vs 2016 Suzuki Vitara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeSuzuki
MiToModelVitara
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSUV
4/5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
198 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1373 cc
120 HPPower140 HP
206 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Petrol / LPGFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank47 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption6,3 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
195/55 R16Tyre size215/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4063 mmLength4175 mm
1720 mmWidth1775 mm
1446 mmHeight1610 mm
1145/1197 KgWeight1210 Kg
2511 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo and 2016 Suzuki Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…