DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Chevrolet Trax vs 2016 Suzuki Vitara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Trax

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeSuzuki
TraxModelVitara
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
195 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1364 ccEngine displacement1373 cc
140 HPPower140 HP
200 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
53 ltFuel tank47 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption6,3 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4248 mmLength4175 mm
1776 mmWidth1775 mm
1674 mmHeight1610 mm
1380 KgWeight1210 Kg
2555 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Chevrolet Trax and 2016 Suzuki Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Trax leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…