2004 • Suzuki
Reno
Suzuki Reno 2.0i (128 Hp) 2004Overall Score59.5/100
2004 Suzuki Reno vs 2004 Rover 25 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Rover
25
Rover 25 2.0 TD (113 Hp) 2004Overall Score60.25/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Suzuki RenoSpecificationRover 25
SuzukiMakeRover
RenoModel25
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5
Performance
Suzuki RenoSpecificationRover 25
—0–100 km/h9,1 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
128 HPPower113 HP
174 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Suzuki RenoSpecificationRover 25
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption7,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption6,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Suzuki RenoSpecificationRover 25
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Suzuki RenoSpecificationRover 25
4295 mmLength3990 mm
1725 mmWidth1688 mm
1445 mmHeight1419 mm
—Weight1130 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Suzuki Reno and 2004 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…