2004 • Rover
25
Rover 25 2.0 TD (113 Hp) 2004Overall Score60.25/100
2004 Rover 25 vs 2004 Suzuki Reno Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Suzuki
Reno
Suzuki Reno 2.0i (128 Hp) 2004Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 25SpecificationSuzuki Reno
RoverMakeSuzuki
25ModelReno
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5
Performance
Rover 25SpecificationSuzuki Reno
9,1 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
113 HPPower128 HP
260 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 25SpecificationSuzuki Reno
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank0 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption—
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 25SpecificationSuzuki Reno
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 25SpecificationSuzuki Reno
3990 mmLength4295 mm
1688 mmWidth1725 mm
1419 mmHeight1445 mm
1130 KgWeight—
2500 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Rover 25 and 2004 Suzuki Reno approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…