DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 MG ZR vs 2004 Suzuki Reno Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZRSpecificationSuzuki Reno
MGMakeSuzuki
ZRModelReno
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

MG ZRSpecificationSuzuki Reno
10,0 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
113 HPPower128 HP
260 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZRSpecificationSuzuki Reno
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank0 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption—
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZRSpecificationSuzuki Reno
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZRSpecificationSuzuki Reno
4011 mmLength4295 mm
1690 mmWidth1725 mm
1400 mmHeight1445 mm
1155 KgWeight—
2502 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 MG ZR and 2004 Suzuki Reno approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…