DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Suzuki Reno vs 2004 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Suzuki RenoSpecificationMG ZS
SuzukiMakeMG
RenoModelZS
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Suzuki RenoSpecificationMG ZS
—0–100 km/h9,5 s
0 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
128 HPPower113 HP
174 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Suzuki RenoSpecificationMG ZS
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption7,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Suzuki RenoSpecificationMG ZS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Suzuki RenoSpecificationMG ZS
4295 mmLength4520 mm
1725 mmWidth1700 mm
1445 mmHeight1390 mm
—Weight1225 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Suzuki Reno and 2004 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…