DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Suzuki Kizashi vs 2012 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Kizashi

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeVolvo
KizashiModelC30
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

7,8 s0–100 km/h8,6 s
215 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2393 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
178 HPPower177 HP
230 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
63 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/45 R18 94WTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4650 mmLength4266 mm
1820 mmWidth1782 mm
1470 mmHeight1447 mm
1494 KgWeight1451 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Suzuki Kizashi and 2012 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Kizashi leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…