DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Jeep Compass vs 2012 Suzuki Kizashi Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Kizashi

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeSuzuki
CompassModelKizashi
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,90 s0–100 km/h7,8 s
201 km/hTop speed215 km/h
2143 ccEngine displacement2393 cc
163 HPPower178 HP
320 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank63 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R17Tyre size235/45 R18 94W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4448 mmLength4650 mm
1812 mmWidth1820 mm
1718 mmHeight1470 mm
1680 KgWeight1494 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Jeep Compass and 2012 Suzuki Kizashi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Kizashi leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…