DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo C30 vs 2012 Suzuki Kizashi Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Kizashi

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeSuzuki
C30ModelKizashi
2012Model year2012
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h7,8 s
0 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement2393 cc
177 HPPower178 HP
400 NmTorque230 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank63 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size235/45 R18 94W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4266 mmLength4650 mm
1782 mmWidth1820 mm
1447 mmHeight1470 mm
1451 KgWeight1494 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo C30 and 2012 Suzuki Kizashi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Kizashi leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…